The stack has grown every year since 2014, from 75 standing obligations to 4,972
Cumulative recurring obligations created by NYC local laws enacted 2014–2026, by type of recurrence. Two thirds of the total are open-ended duties with no end date.
- Ongoing duties (enforce, operate, maintain)
- On a schedule (annual, quarterly, every N years)
Almost nothing on this chart expires on its own. A one-time obligation (write one rule, install one sign) is done when it's done. A recurring one, an annual report, an inspection program, an enforcement duty, stays on the agency's books until a later law repeals it. Only 155 of the 2,138 laws set their own expiration date, and this chart subtracts the 146 recurring obligations whose laws have already lapsed. Every year the Council adds a few hundred more: 509 in 2025 alone.
This is the pattern Stanford's RegLab found in state law, where California's reporting requirements grew 400% from 2000 to 2025, and the pattern Governor Hochul's July 2026 "regulatory reset" order targets. The stack above is the New York City Council's version.
What counts as recurring: obligations the tracker tags with an ongoing recurrence (a standing duty to enforce, operate, or maintain something) or a fixed cadence (weekly through every-10-years). One-time obligations (3,063 of the 8,185 total) and 4 tagged as-needed are excluded. Obligations are dated by their law's enactment date; 9 recurring obligations without one are excluded.
Counts are as enacted: the tracker does not net out the small number of obligations later repealed or superseded by amendment, and laws enacted before 2014 are outside the data, so the true standing total is somewhat different in both directions. The 67-fold growth reflects accumulation rather than any comparable rise in annual lawmaking.
Source: Author's analysis of NYC Council Legistar law text via the NYCuriosity Legislation Implementation Tracker (data as of August 2026).