← Streets Plan 2026

Program Breakdown

Tables in this post: Overview Compliance Tracker Fiscal Impact Program Breakdown LL195 Mandates

Cost by Program (10-Year, Additional Above Baseline)

Program-by-program cost breakdown from highest to lowest. Where the fiscal impact statement cited offsets from existing DOT commitments, those are noted, these figures reflect the net additional cost of the mandate above what DOT was already spending.

Program Cost type 10-year cost Mandate scale Notes
Capital programs
Bus stop real-time passenger info (RTPI) Capital $658,400,000 14,580 stops lacking RTPI Largest single item; spans FY22–31
Intersection redesign Capital $400,000,000 4,000 intersections (2,000/plan) $40M/yr additional; other benchmarks may offset
Bus stop shelters & benches Capital $65,900,000 11,556 stops needing upgrades $14.3M plan 1; $51.7M plan 2
Expense programs
Protected bus lanes Expense $245,600,000 ~300 miles total (FY22–31) $122.8M each plan; 30 mi/yr
Accessible pedestrian signals (APS) Expense $224,000,000 5,000 signals (FY22–31) Net of 1,450-unit existing DOT commitment
Transit signal priority (TSP) Expense $55,100,000 750 (yr 1); 1,000/yr thereafter Net of $26.6M existing offset; plan 1 only
DOT support staff Expense $54,900,000 40 new positions $5.5M/yr (PS + OTPS)
Master plan unit Expense $50,000,000 2 new headcount positions $5M/yr (PS + OTPS)
Commercial loading & truck routes Expense $19,600,000 Citywide assessment & amendments $10.5M plan 1; $9.1M plan 2
Protected bike lanes Expense $11,800,000 250 mi plan 1; connected network plan 2 Net of existing DOT commitment ($59.2M/yr baseline)
Parking policies Expense $8,900,000 Policy development & implementation
Zero-cost / offset items
Pedestrian ramps $0 3,000 corner ramps by FY31 Fully offset by existing ADA court settlement
Pedestrian space −$73,300,000 1M sq ft within 2 years Surplus, DOT already committed to 1.5M sq ft; offsets other costs

All figures are additional costs above DOT's existing baseline. Negative value for pedestrian space reflects a surplus offset available to fund other mandates. Source: NYC Council Finance Division, Fiscal Impact Statement for Intro. 1557-A, Oct 25, 2019.

About this data

  • All figures are "additional above baseline." The fiscal impact statement estimates the marginal cost of LL195 mandates, not the total DOT program budget. For example, DOT had already committed to $59.2M/yr for 50 miles of bike lanes; the $11.8M figure for protected bike lanes is only the cost above that existing commitment.
  • Pedestrian space surplus (−$73.3M) is a cost offset, not a revenue item. DOT's existing commitment to 1.5M sq ft of pedestrian space already exceeds the LL195 mandate, freeing up funds for other programs.
  • Program costs do not sum exactly to the fiscal summary totals. The fiscal impact statement lists programs in narrative form; not all items are broken into plan-1/plan-2 sub-totals. The fiscal summary table is taken directly from the official statement; program figures are extracted from individual program narrative paragraphs.
  • Source code and raw CSV files are available on GitHub.